A new study by Jim Haywood and colleagues strongly suggests that sporadic volcanic eruptions in the northern hemisphere also strongly influence the sea surface temperature gradient and cause Sahelian drought.
The Met Office Earth System coupled ocean-atmosphere model (HadGEM2-ES) has been used to simulate two instances of these eruptions – Katmai in 1912 and El Chichón in 1982 which hurled millions of tons of sulfur dioxide high up into the northern hemisphere stratosphere. Once in the stratosphere, the sulfur dioxide is gradually converted into sulfuric acid particles which reflect sunlight back to space and lead to a cooling of the Earth's surface in the northern hemisphere relative to the southern hemisphere.
Haywood and colleagues show that the HadGEM2-ES coupled atmosphere ocean model is able to accurately predict the impact of volcanic eruptions on Sahelian rainfall, which suggests that accurate predictions of droughts in the Sahel should be possible subsequent to future volcanic eruptions, with obvious implications for disaster relief and aid agencies.
The study then goes further by modeling the impacts of continuous deliberate injection of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, which has been suggested as a potentially plausible measure to counterbalance the impacts of global warming. Results suggest deliberate unilateral aerosol injection into the northern hemisphere causes significant drought in the Sahel, while injection into the southern hemisphere causes a significant greening.
While on the face of it, this suggests that one could potentially inject into the southern hemisphere to make the Sahel a more hospitable and agriculturally viable region, the team stresses that other areas of the Earth have to be considered. While there is a large increase in rainfall over much of the Sahel and the African continent, there is a sharp decrease in rainfall over the Nordeste and Amazonian regions of Brazil which could have disastrous consequences for these regions.
The study goes on to show that if injections are balanced into both the northern and southern hemispheres, then major shifts in the monsoon circulation are avoided suggesting that unilateral injection into either hemisphere should not be contemplated. However, the emerging consensus from this and other studies is that so-called “solar radiation management” schemes cannot simply counterbalance the impacts of global warming. There are always residual regional climate impacts leading to regional “winners and losers.” This suggests that solar practical radiation management geoengineering would require consensual global governance.