Laboratory Equipment

LABNEWS Banner

Facebook  YouTube  Twitter 

 


Site Sponser






Home > Resources > Laboratory News

Read/Post Comments

Cloud Whitening Won't Cool Climate

June 14, 2010

051410_clouds
Plans to “whiten” the clouds over the world’s oceans so that they reflect some of the sun’s powerful rays may fail to delay global warming, according to British and Finnish researchers.

Scientists from the Univ. of Leeds and the Finnish Meteorological Institute found that injecting sea spray into the atmosphere to generate brighter clouds may actually hinder natural cloud formation in some areas.

Human manipulation of the climate—known as geoengineering—has been suggested by scientists as a way of slowing down global warming while efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions continue.

Cloud whitening (or cloud seeding) is one proposed form of geoengineering that would use off-shore vessels to pump sea spray into the atmosphere. The salt particles in the spray would in theory help to form brighter clouds that reflect more sunlight back into space, thus having a cooling effect on climate.

Previous studies using climate models have suggested that whitening the clouds could cool the planet enough to allow for a doubling of current CO2 levels. However, this latest study, published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, shows that the sea spray emitted could interfere with existing cloud-forming particles known as aerosol.

The researchers used a global computer model to look at how the artificial emissions of sea spray would impact on the concentration of cloud drops, which is what controls changes in cloud brightness.

“Our research suggests that attempts to generate brighter clouds via sea spray geoengineering would at best have only a tiny effect and could actually cause some clouds to become less bright,” says study author Ken Carslaw, a professor at the Univ. of Leeds.

Natural cloud drops form on tiny particles, or aerosols, suspended in the atmosphere. The higher the concentration of cloud drops the more they reflect the sun’s rays back to space.

Over oceans much of this aerosol is in the form of tiny sea spray particles blown off the surface. The geoengineering proposal is to enhance this natural aerosol source to make clouds brighter.

“The formation of clouds from artificial sea spray is particularly sensitive to background levels of aerosol,” says Carslaw. “This means that injecting spray around coastal areas where there is a lot of air pollution from land may not produce enough extra cloud drops to stave off global warming. In fact, in some locations the artificial spray particles may hinder natural drop formation and could have an opposite effect on climate to that intended.”

“Another problem with the proposed technology is that the efficiency of artificial sea spray generation decreases as the wind speed drops, so you can’t emit much spray where you really need it,” says study author Hannele Korhonen from the Finnish Meteorological Institute.

Carslaw adds: “While the concept of geoengineering may be appealing, in practice it appears that generating a uniform covering of reflective clouds over large regions of the world’s oceans would be extremely challenging.”

Source: Univ. of Leeds


Contact Editor Print Article Email To Friend

Comments
Charles R. Anderson 6/14/2010 6:15:59 PM
With the Earth now in a cooling phase, it might make more sense to be working on plans to decrease low altitude cloud cover. But, frankly, I would like to see some evidence that climatologists actually know what they are doing before they start trying to manipulate the climate. The evidence for significant CO2 greenhouse warming has not just proven elusive, but the model predictions of a broad hot spot from 8 to 12 km over the equator and the lower latitudes has simply proven wrong. The claimed large positive feedback from water vapor also appears wrong. On the other hand, solar cycles, cloud cover variations with the solar cycle, and the importance of the high-heat content ocean oscillations appear to be winning the scientific argument as the important factors in climate change.

Type Your Comment...
Name:   
E-mail (optional) *E-mail addresses do not publish to the site.
Comment:   


Editor's Corner

Tim Studt, Editor-in-Chief
Tim Studt
Editor in Chief

Statistical Sampling Could Protect Food Safety
The current recall of hundreds of millions of eggs based on a couple of hundred cases of salmonella poisoning (none fatal) reflects on the statistical sampling methods in place to protect the public’s safety.. ...continue

Application Notes
More

Most Viewed Content
Advantage Business Media © Copyright 2010 Advantage Business Media
Privacy Policy |  Terms & Conditions |  Advertise with Us