Laboratory Equipment

Pittcon 2010 Aisle-by-Aisle Guide
Our Current Issue offers even more Pittcon product previews.
   
Facebook.dj/LabEquipment  Youtube.com/LabEquipment  Twitter.com/LabEquipment

 


Site Sponser






Home > Community > Editor's Corner

Read/Post Comments

Storms Brew for Lab Relocation

Ashley Glowinski
Ashley Glowinski
e-Editor

August 7, 2009

Dorothy may no longer be in Kansas, but according to The Washington Post, a $700 million research facility for infectious pathogens may be.

The Department of Homeland Security hopes to break ground on the new laboratory next year to replace the aging research facility in Plum Island, N.Y. Now the heart of tornado alley has to worry not only about twisters (of which they experienced nearly 200 in 2008 alone) but also the exposure of harmful disease.

Living in such close proximity to frequent twisters and the H1N1 “swine” flu virus sounds more like a bad horror movie than a reality, but concern does not lie with Kansas locals alone. Viruses being examined, such as foot-and-mouth disease, could have a severe effect on livestock and, consequently, food supply.


In fact, in a recent report the Government Accountability Office claims an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in Kansas could have an estimated $1 billion impact.

No wonder the GAO claims the DHS made a hasty decision to relocate and believes it could lead to “regrettable consequences.” While the DHS considered multiple locations, the GAO says there is not enough evidence that making the move is safe anywhere.

From a researcher’s standpoint, wanting to explore disease further is understandable--to risk harm now to prevent harm later. But if a project can jeopardize the general public in any way, expect major backfire. No one wants a reoccurrence of the 1950’s Nevada Testing Site, where nuclear experiments reportedly resulted in excess amounts of cancer-related deaths.

So, as the DHS scrambles to submit another study to the Senate for approving the pathogen lab relocation, hopefully they will carefully consider the worst-case scenario. If exposure to disease leads to epidemic, it won’t matter if we are in Kansas or not. We will all struggle to weather the storm.


Contact Editor Print Article Email To Friend

Comments
Van R. 8/13/2009 4:32:12 PM
The army already has a high level lab at Dugway in the desert of Utah. There would clearly have to be extreme measures taken to minimize any chance of pathogen release, but it is pretty safe from natural disaster and away from huge population centers.

Steve Lueck 8/13/2009 2:37:25 PM
If the lab is to be located in Kansas, put it in an old salt mine. Put level 4 containment practices in place for access. Takes tornadoes out of the equation and reduces vector escape chance proportionally. While thinking about relocation, lets move all the federal government DC installations to Kansas. Make it rather along the lines of the relocation of the Brazilian capital from Rio to Brasilia. I really think that work products would be improved if the high up federal managers actually worked in salt mines.

M 8/11/2009 1:17:58 PM
I am a resident of Manhattan Kansas and I can't say I'm thrilled about having NBAF in my backyard, but this editorial is just one more uninformed, unjustified scare tactic designed to incite fear rather than intelligent discourse. I would expect better from a supposedly scientifically oriented publication. Where would you prefer the BL-4 facility go? On the coast where storms or simply rising sea levels would inundate it? Perhaps near an earthquake fault line? Name one place in the United States that is close enough to "infrastructure" (roads, electricity, water) that a working laboratory is feasible, but far enough from people and animals that no one and nothing could be affected by a "break". There is no place in this country with no people, no animals, no agriculture, and no natural hazards; no hurricanes, no floods, no land slides, no earthquakes, no sink holes, no upthrusts... If not here, then where? If you don't have a better suggestion, how can you argue with the one that was made?

Type Your Comment...
Name:   
E-mail (optional) *E-mail addresses do not publish to the site.
Comment:   


Editor's Corner

Tim Studt, Editor-in-Chief
Tim Studt
 Editor in Chief


The Rapidly Evolving Automated Lab

Implementing lab automation, robotics, and automated analyses are the easy parts. Integrating these technologies with the next technology level—artificial intelligence, autonomous operation, and android-like interfaces—will take a little more effort. But it will come...continue
Application Notes
More

Most Viewed Content
Bioscience Technology Chromatography Techniques Drug Discovery & Development Laboratory Equipment Pharmaceutical Processing R&D Scientific Computing
Advantage Business Media © Copyright 2008 Advantage Business Media this is my site
Privacy Policy |  Terms & Conditions |  Advertise with Us